![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Your result for The LONG Scientific Personality Test...
INTJ -The Mastermind
You scored 0% I to E, 37% N to S, 90% F to T, and 11% J to P!
You are more introverted than extroverted. You are more intuitive than observant, you are more thinking based than feeling based, and you prefer to have a plan rather than leaving things to chance. Your type is best described by the word "mastermind", which belongs to the larger group called rationals. Only 1% of the population shares your type. You are very strong willed and self-confident. You can hardly rest until you have things settled. You will only adopt ideas and rules if they make sense. You are a great brainstormer and often come up with creative solutions to difficult problems. You are open to new concepts, and often actively seek them out.
As a romantic partner, you can be both fascinating yet demanding. You are not apt to express your emotions, leaving your partner wondering where they are with you. You strongly dislike repeating yourself or listening to the disorganized process of sorting through emotional conflicts. You see your own commitments as self-evident and don't see why you need to repeat something already expressed. You have the most difficulty in admitting your vulnerabilities. You feel the most appreciated when your partner admires the quality of your innovations and when they listen respectfully to your ideas and advice. You need plenty of quiet to explore your interests to the depth that gives you satisfaction.
Your group summary: rationals (NT)
Your type summary: INTJ
As a romantic partner, you can be both fascinating yet demanding. You are not apt to express your emotions, leaving your partner wondering where they are with you. You strongly dislike repeating yourself or listening to the disorganized process of sorting through emotional conflicts. You see your own commitments as self-evident and don't see why you need to repeat something already expressed. You have the most difficulty in admitting your vulnerabilities. You feel the most appreciated when your partner admires the quality of your innovations and when they listen respectfully to your ideas and advice. You need plenty of quiet to explore your interests to the depth that gives you satisfaction.
Your group summary: rationals (NT)
Your type summary: INTJ
Take The LONG Scientific Personality Test at OkCupid
Your result for The Lover Style Profile Test...
The Suave Lover
32% partner focus, 57% aggressiveness, 45% adventurousness
Based on the results of this test, it is highly likely that:
You prefer your romance and love to be traditional rather than daring or out-of-the-ordinary, you would rather pursue than be pursued and, when it comes to physical love, you concentrate more on enjoying the experience rather than worrying about your performance.
This places you in the Lover Style of: The Suave Lover.
The Suave Lover is a wonderful Lover Style, and is reminiscent of some of the most classic lover figures of all time, such as Casanova or Don Juan, or more recently James Bond (several of the "Bond girls" fit this type, too). This shouldn't be confused with a "player" or someone who is solely interested in physical love, but someone who is looking for an incredibly elusive thing: a worthy partner. The Suave Lover is a treasure to find, but can be incredibly difficult to hold on to, once found.
In terms of physical love, the Suave Lover can sometimes be surprisingly tender. Given the right setting, and the right lover, the Suave Lover can be a delight in bed.
Best Compatibility can probably be found with: The Devoted Lover (most of all) or the Romantic Lover, or the Liberated Lover.
Congratulations!
THE LOVER STYLE PROFILE TEST
You prefer your romance and love to be traditional rather than daring or out-of-the-ordinary, you would rather pursue than be pursued and, when it comes to physical love, you concentrate more on enjoying the experience rather than worrying about your performance.
This places you in the Lover Style of: The Suave Lover.
The Suave Lover is a wonderful Lover Style, and is reminiscent of some of the most classic lover figures of all time, such as Casanova or Don Juan, or more recently James Bond (several of the "Bond girls" fit this type, too). This shouldn't be confused with a "player" or someone who is solely interested in physical love, but someone who is looking for an incredibly elusive thing: a worthy partner. The Suave Lover is a treasure to find, but can be incredibly difficult to hold on to, once found.
In terms of physical love, the Suave Lover can sometimes be surprisingly tender. Given the right setting, and the right lover, the Suave Lover can be a delight in bed.
Best Compatibility can probably be found with: The Devoted Lover (most of all) or the Romantic Lover, or the Liberated Lover.
Congratulations!
THE LOVER STYLE PROFILE TEST
Take The Lover Style Profile Test at OkCupid
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 02:14 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 02:16 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 02:20 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 02:26 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 02:29 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 02:33 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 02:47 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 02:52 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 02:58 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 03:01 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 03:03 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 03:08 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 03:11 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 03:14 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 03:34 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 03:42 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 04:22 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 04:26 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 04:30 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 04:32 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 04:34 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 04:36 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 04:44 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 06:22 pm (UTC)From: